Netflix’s show titled Zero Day dives into political and legal details to establish significant constitutional concerns quite early on in the show. One of the most important scenes in episode 1 takes place when President Evelyn Mitchell played by Angela Bassett declares the suspension of habeas corpus.
This verdict brings out concerns about the government's overreach and puts forth the groundwork for the TV show.
With Zero Day having similarities to contemporary political dramas, its examination of real-world legal ideologies adds complexity to its story.
But what is habeas corpus, and why is its suspension noteworthy in the Netflix show?
Habeas Corpus in Zero Day: Why does it matter?
The term "habeas corpus" is heard for the first time during an important scene in episode one when President Mitchell clarifies the government's reply to a substantial cyberattack.
While addressing former President George Mullen played by Robert De Niro, Mitchelle sums up the creation of a distinct investigatory commission with comprehensive authority, inclusive of supervision powers, search and seizure rights, and the capability to overrule habeas corpus.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2a08/b2a0805aa2d9c216f494d8c1799507db3ea26d91" alt="A still from ZERO DAY | Official Trailer | (Image via.Netflix/Youtube)"
Mitchell rationalizes this cause by highlighting the urgency of the state of affairs.
She tells Mullen;
"The only thing more important than a quick result is a result that everyone can trust. They trust you."
This implies that the severe measures of the commission are essential to uphold civic self-assurance. However, overruling the habeas corpus has severe repercussions.
Habeas corpus is an extremely important section of the American justice system, making sure that citizens will not be imprisoned without prior and proper procedure. It ensures that any person placed under arrest has the constitutional right to present themselves before a court to confront the legitimacy of their custody.
The U.S. Constitution safeguards this right under Article I, Section 9, affirming;
"The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it."
Factually, the overruling of habeas corpus has been uncommon in the history of America. However, it did take place during the Civil War when President Abraham Lincoln appealed it to overpower Confederate revolts.
In Netflix’s Zero Day, Mitchell’s verdict implies her management is keen on finding a way around constitutional defenses in the face of a nationwide emergency.
The political and legal ramifications in Zero Day
Mullen’s reaction in Zero Day focuses on the seriousness of the situation. As he manages the commission’s powers, it is crystal clear that he is disturbed by the government's approach.
The overruling of habeas corpus means that citizens can be arrested immediately without a trial—a move that increases moral and legal fears about equalizing safety and civic rights.
Mitchell’s reasoning implies her administration is fixated on locating a perpetrator —whether or not that individual may be responsible. The urgency of closing up the inquiry hints that authorities may be prioritizing the completion of tasks rather than following due procedure.
By referring to habeas corpus, Zero Day grounds its political thriller story in real-world constitutional problems, making its story feel even more applicable to contemporary society.
As the show unfolds, the series slowly prepares to investigate the effects of unrestricted government authority and the strain between national safety and the personal freedoms of the nation’s citizens.
The limited series is currently streaming on Netflix.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0413/a04130f56b21988025ba6767a4a5df923f4476be" alt="comments icon"
Your perspective matters!
Start the conversation