"Victimless crime" — When Shark Tank investor Kevin O'Leary reacted to the $355 million judgment against the President

During a CNN interview in February 2024, Kevin O'Leary, an investor on the popular show Shark Tank and the Chairman of O'Leary Ventures, commented on the $355 million judgment imposed on then-former President Donald Trump. O'Leary explains that no one had lost any money in the situation. He also expressed concerns about the broader implications for the investment community, stating,

"This was a victimless crime. Nobody lost any money and a judge out of nowhere put on a $355 million penalty."

The Shark Tank investor's remarks reflect a critical stance on the case, which has sparked widespread debate over its significance and consequences.

---

Shark Tank investor Kevin O'Leary's view on the business and legal impact of the $355 million judgment on the President

Legal implications of the judgment

O'Leary's comments regarding the judgment raise questions about the legal basis for such penalties. CNN’s Laura Coates pointed out that the charges against President Trump involved "falsification of business records" and other financial crimes, which have specific legal definitions.

"Those are actual crimes. I think it's your point is that these should not have been prosecuted?" Coates asked.

In response, O'Leary questioned the prosecution of these charges, stating that:

"Everything you just listed off is done by every real estate developer everywhere on Earth in every city."

He underscored that such actions, although potentially illegal, are commonly practiced in the industry without facing legal consequences. He argued that the case is unprecedented, stating,

"This has never, ever been prosecuted."

The Shark Tank investor's viewpoint suggests that the prosecution of these specific crimes, particularly against President Trump, may be an outlier in legal history.

---

Impact on New York's business environment

Kevin O'Leary also raised concerns about the broader implications for business in New York. He pointed out that the judgment and the state's stance on prosecuting high-profile figures could deter potential investors. O'Leary asked if the state's legal actions might harm its attractiveness as a business hub, saying,

"Do you think there's a chance I would ever take a chance on New York again?"

The Shark Tank investor further remarked that, in his view, the state might lose its status as a desirable location for investment due to the perception of legal unpredictability, stating,

"New York is turning itself into a flyover state,"

O'Leary's concerns reflect a sentiment that, for some investors, legal risk and the perception of political motivations in prosecutions may overshadow the economic potential of a region. The broader effect of such high-profile legal cases on investment decisions is something that many in the business community are considering.

---

Broader consequences for the legal system

O'Leary’s reaction to the judgment also points to a potential shift in the way legal cases against public figures might be handled. He expressed uncertainty about the precedent set by this particular case, which could impact future legal proceedings.

"We're all asking each other who's next," he said

His statement suggests that the outcome of this case could signal a new approach to legal actions against influential individuals. This uncertainty reflects broader concerns about the application of legal principles to powerful figures and the consequences for others who may find themselves facing similar accusations.

The Shark Tank investor suggests that such cases become more common, there could be a significant shift in how both business leaders and politicians approach their actions, knowing that legal risks could extend to them in ways they have not faced before.

---

Catch Shark Tank every Friday at 8:00 pm ET on ABC. Don't miss out—stream episodes anytime on Hulu!