Did JD Campbell burn down his own house in No Good Deed? Possibility explored

Netflix
Netflix's "No Good Deed" Screening & Conversation - Source: Getty

Did JD Campbell set fire to his own house in No Good Deed? The short answer is: We don't know for sure. While the show hints at JD's possible involvement, this is never confirmed onscreen. Even if on that night, JD left and looked quite pleased while the flames consumed his home, this is no proof he actually did it.

If we consider Liz Feldman's style, this is not atypical. This ambiguity leaves us questioning what really happened. By not showing JD starting the fire on screen, we are left with more questions than answers.

The night of the fire: what we know about it

The most intriguing detail is JD's behavior when leaving the scene. He drives with a disconcerting tranquility, a stark contrast to the chaos he left behind.

This posture reinforces the ambiguity: was it a calculated act or simply moving away from something he knew was about to collapse? The absence of a clear answer feeds the narrative tension, inviting the viewer to interpret the fire as either a conscious decision by JD or a twist of fate.

Moreover, the series plays with the audience's expectations. When Margo is seen in the middle of the fire, the initial impression is that she will not survive, creating a sense of poetic justice.

However, her survival with physical and emotional scars adds an extra layer of complexity to the story, making it clear that the consequences are not as linear as they seem.

Ambiguity as a narrative tool - No Good Deed

Liz Feldman, known for her work on Dead to Me, builds stories where answers are as important as questions. The uncertainty about JD's actions in No Good Deed is a narrative choice that invites the audience to explore the layers of her characters and the implications of their decisions.

This ambiguity is not just a technique to maintain audience interest; it is a commentary on human nature. JD is portrayed as a wounded and complex man, and the doubt about his involvement in the fire reflects the moral complexities of his journey.

As in Dead to Me, Feldman challenges the audience to embrace the discomfort of not having all the answers, making the experience of watching the series deeply engaging.

At the same time, this narrative choice broadens the emotional connection of the viewer with the story. The absence of a definitive conclusion for JD and the fire allows the audience to project their own interpretations and emotions onto the character, making the ending of No Good Deed a unique experience for each person.

JD and Margo's relationship: from dream-like to nightmarish

JD Campbell seemed to believe Margo was the ultimate best thing in his life—until he discovered she was nothing like he imagined. The truth about the woman he shared his house with, and her secrets, came crashing down like an avalanche, dragging JD into a place of anger and frustration.

Margo's betrayal was more than emotional. With that, she placed JD at the center of a web of lies and tragedies. She had an with the teenage son of the Morgans.

This unchained a series of unfortunate events that ended up with his death. Imagine how painful it must have been for JD to realize how manipulative and immoral his wife was.

The fire can symbolize JD's effort to eliminate her from his life. JD is complex. Emotionally fragile and unstable, he's attempting to reassert control in challenging circumstances. The fire, whether directly caused by him or not, serves as a metaphor for his desire to conclude a difficult chapter of his life.

The series finale does not show JD directly setting the fire, but he leaves the scene with a disturbing calm. While the house is burning, Margo is seen lost in her own thoughts, remembering Jacob's murder. The fire also seems like a symbolic punishment, a literal and figurative closure for everything she represented in JD's life.

Despite JD's intentions, Margo survived the fire. With physical scars that reflect the emotional marks of her actions, she now faces justice under her true name, Luann. For JD, the fire seems to have been a watershed moment. He gets a new professional role, rises financially, and apparently frees himself from Margo's shadow.

What does the future hold for JD and Margo?

The contrast between JD's and Margo's fates highlights the central irony of the narrative. While JD apparently finds a new beginning, Margo faces the consequences of her actions.

However, the series avoids offering a simplistic or moralistic ending, suggesting that both characters still carry the weight of their choices, albeit in different ways.

comment icon
Comment
Edited by Zainab Shaikh