Dateline: Mystery On Lockhart Road - What happened to Indiana state trooper David Camm's wife and daughter? Details explored

Dateline NBC's crime series has presented some of the most fascinating and famous cases of all time, but none of them is so controversy-ridden as its coverage of the Lockhart Road double homicide. In a classic episode, Dateline revisits the brutal murders of Kimberly Camm and her two children, Brad and Jill, who were gunned down in their garage on September 28, 2000. The case was suddenly turned on its head one night when police arrested Kimberly's ex-husband, former Indiana State Trooper David Camm, even though he had a solid alibi and no direct evidence against him. Dateline traces the investigation's twists and turns, bringing the courtroom struggles and forensic findings to bear on this case.

The show delves into how David Camm's case evolved into a high-profile case of investigative abuse and forensic fiasco, the issue of three trials before his final acquittal in 2013. Although DNA evidence ultimately resulted in the conviction of another man, Charles Boney, Dateline investigates if the justice system really got it right. The case is still a classic example of how tunnel vision in a criminal investigation can result in a miscarriage of justice and forensic science limitations. Dateline asks serious questions regarding the investigation and prosecution through sole interviews and analysis by experts.

The Tragic Events of September 28, 2000

David Camm, a former Indiana state trooper, returned late in the evening of September 28, 2000, to his Georgetown, Indiana, residence to find his wife, Kimberly Camm, and his two children, Brad and Jill, brutally murdered in the garage.

Dateline reconstructs the chronology of events on the eve of this gruesome discovery, through interviews with main characters involved with the case. The relatively abrupt crime spawned a case that would become a complicated and contentious greater-than-a-decade-long battle in court.

Early Investigation and Arrest

Police quickly focused on David Camm as the prime suspect shortly after discovering the bodies. Despite his alibi of playing church gym hoops in front of numerous witnesses, he was arrested and officially charged with murder within days. Dateline examines the rationale for this initial arrest, asking whether or not detectives jumped to conclusions in excluding other suspects.

Prosecutors relied on bloodstain pattern analysis and charges of extramarital affairs as the cornerstone of their case against him. Also, allegations were made that part of the forensic evidence suggested that Camm was proximate to the victims at the time the crime was committed, results that were subsequently challenged by experts. Experts included in the Dateline segment challenge the validity of this forensic evidence, pointing out how deficient interpretations can have led to wrongful convictions.

The First Conviction and Appeal

David Camm was convicted in 2002 and sentenced to 195 years. The case relied significantly on forensic evidence, which Dateline explores in-depth, and bloodstain pattern analysis, some of which were later found to be controversial and purportedly misapplied. His conviction was, ultimately, overturned in 2004 on grounds of admissibility on evidence of his purported infidelity, which was prejudicial. The court ruled that the information had tainted the jury's decision and ordered a retrial to be conducted.

The Reveal of New Evidence

Following the overturned conviction, forensic analysis unveiled a key piece of evidence—a sweatshirt found at the crime scene—that contained DNA linked to Charles Boney, a previously convicted violent criminal. Boney was then charged and convicted of being involved in the crime.

In spite of this, prosecutors moved to hold a second trial against Camm, alleging that Camm had conspired to commit the crime with Boney's assistance. The presence of Boney's DNA was huge evidence pointing toward the direct involvement of Camm, but prosecutors reiterated, noting that there was still circumstantial evidence that implicated Camm in the killings. Dateline looks at how the revelation of Boney's participation was an added layer of complexity to the case but did not necessarily clear Camm.

The Second Conviction and Second Appeal

In 2006, Camm was again convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole. Dateline features significant trial testimonies, such as Charles Boney's changing statements, which the defense claimed were inconsistent and self-serving. The second 2009 conviction was appealed as well, on the basis of concerns about the forensic evidence introduced during the trial, and on allegations of misapplication by the prosecution of some evidence and witness testimony most likely to sway the jury against Camm.

The Third Trial and Final Acquittal

David Camm was tried for the third time in 2013. Dateline follows how forensic specialists tore apart the main evidence in the previous trials, discrediting bloodstain pattern analysis and illuminating investigative blunders. Experts asserted that the analysis utilized in the last two trials was substandard and failed to verify Camm's presence at the crime scene.

In addition, the defense claimed the investigation was tainted with confirmation bias because the authorities immediately identified Camm as the main suspect. After exhaustive hours of deliberation, the jury acquitted him of all counts, and he was released from prison after serving 13 years in jail. Dateline provides exclusive interviews from Camm and his attorneys, looking back at the long path to justice.

Charles Boney's Conviction

Charles Boney was convicted individually for his participation in the murders and was given a 225-year prison term. His involvement in the murders was confirmed through DNA evidence and testimonies. He is still imprisoned in an Indiana jail.

Boney maintained that he was merely an accessory and Camm was the mastermind of the crime, but defense attorneys and legal analysts stated that Boney's fluctuating accounts were unreliable. Dateline analyzes Boney's testimony and whether he was really the mastermind or a willing participant in the crime.

The Effect of the Case

The Camm case has been widely studied in forensic and legal circles due to its implications for criminal justice procedures. The sequence of convictions and subsequent acquittals brought issues of reliability in forensic science, prosecutor integrity, and guaranteeing a fair trial into the spotlight.

The case also generated a firestorm over the risks of creating unconventional forensic evidence. Dateline speaks with forensic experts who are critical of the way that forensic misinterpretations can be used to secure wrongful convictions.

The Broader Implications for Criminal Justice

Aside from the individual tragedy and legal uncertainty, the case implicated systemic flaws in the criminal justice system. The application of discredited forensic methods, which Dateline examines in detail, and the determination of the authorities to continue pursuing the same suspect even when new evidence emerged made this case highly contentious.

Legal commentators have argued that the case was a reminder of the need for independent forensic analysis and evidence presentation reforms to courts.

The killing of Kimberly, Brad, and Jill Camm is a meaningless tragedy that occurred to their family and society as a whole. The subsequent court process demonstrated the complexity of the legal system, where careful and unbiased questioning during criminal proceedings is most critical.

David Camm might have eventually been acquitted, but as Dateline documents, the case remains a demonstration of how hard it is to establish guilt or innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. It is a reminder to the legal community, forensic scientists, and police agencies of the need to conduct painstaking investigations and adhere to the behest of justice.

Help Us Improve