In a case that dragged on for years, Dateline: Secrets Uncovered investigated the tale of Donna Palomba, a Waterbury, Connecticut woman, s*xually attacked in her residence on September 11, 1993. A masked burglar broke into her Waterbury, Connecticut, residence while her children were sleeping and her husband was away on a business trip.
The assailant r*ped her before he left. What ensued was a decade-long nightmare, not just of trauma but also of incredulity, silence, and frustration. The case went cold for over a decade—until DNA revealed John Regan, a local businessman and a family acquaintance, father of two, with no record of violent crime against him.
Dateline: Secrets Uncovered, in the episode Evil Paid a Visit, goes over Donna Palomba's case in depth, relating what happened that evening, the police investigation, the ordeal she endured, and how the truth was ultimately brought to light.
The episode not only lays out the crime itself but also discusses the management of the investigation and the impact it has on the way sexual assault cases are managed. Through in-depth interviews and investigative journalism, Dateline presents a comprehensive examination of one woman's quest for justice when confronted with significant institutional hurdles.
Who is Donna Palomba in Dateline: Evil Paid A Visit
As shown in Dateline: Evil Paid A Visit, Donna Palomba, age 39, mother of two, was an unassuming Waterbury, Connecticut, citizen who was attacked while her children slept and her husband was away. An attacker who was disguised entered her house by force, took her hostage at knifepoint, and r*ped her. When the attacker fled, Palomba promptly reported the crime to the police, and an investigation was launched.
Despite cooperation and physical evidence gathered from the scene, the case suddenly changed direction. Police investigators, without a suspect to locate and no forced entry to deal with, started questioning the credibility of Palomba's testimony. Even though she was never formally declared a suspect, she testified that police treated her like she had fabricated the assault. Her credibility came into question, and the case was eventually closed without charges being filed.
The initial investigation and its limitations
As depicted in Dateline: Evil Paid A Visit, the first investigation faced several issues. Based on Dateline reporting, police officials did not uncover any proof of forced entry and scant forensic evidence leading to a suspect. The likelihood that the assailant was either in possession of a key or else familiar with the routine of the household was mentioned but never adequately pursued when it mattered. Instead, doubt regarding Palomba's account became the primary storyline.
Palomba stated that she was ostracized and marginalized by the authorities. The case never came to court, and she was denied justice or closure. Palomba tried to get some answers over the years but was faced with bureaucratic and legal obstacles at many levels. Despite all this, she kept the physical evidence from the assault, which was about to prove to be important later.
The breakthrough in the case
Dateline showed that in 2004, New Haven's state crime lab reopened the case and tested the stored evidence from the 1993 crime with new DNA methods. The DNA matched John Regan, who had been arrested in New York in 2004 for attempting to kidnap a teenage girl. His DNA had been added to the national database as a result.
Regan, now a convicted father and previously a salesman of medical equipment, was widely known to be a respected member of Waterbury's communities and their surroundings. His arrest did not anticipate such responses. Officers quickly came to learn Regan was guilty not just of the act with Donna Palomba but of more disturbing crimes like a plot to kidnap another woman as well as purported impropriety with comatose or incapacitated women.
How Dateline exposed in "Evil Paid a Visit"
Dateline: Secrets Uncovered devoted an entire episode to deconstructing the reality of Donna Palomba's case. The episode includes interviews with Palomba, police, and legal analysts, using the emotional and procedural arc from 1993 to 2004. It considers not just the evening of the crime, but also the larger context of the investigation—how Donna's experience reflected broader patterns of suspicion, victim-blaming, and the mismanagement of r*pe cases.
The series also follows how Palomba's seized evidence and tenacity helped crack the case. It documents how the community reacted both to the crime itself and to Regan's subsequent arrest, noting the nuances of how to deal with a person who had, outwardly at least, led an upright life.
Who is John Regan?
John Regan was a father and corporate executive who resided in Waterbury, Connecticut. On the surface, he had a traditional, stable existence. But after his arrest on attempted kidnapping charges of a 17-year-old girl in Saratoga Springs, New York, details about his previous life started surfacing.
DNA also connected him to the 1993 attack on Donna Palomba, and follow-up investigations connected him with even more attacks that hinted at a disturbing pattern of behavior. Regan was indicted in court pleadings and police reports for stalking and taking pictures of women and for conspiring to abduct at least one additional woman. He eventually pleaded guilty to attempted kidnapping and was jailed.
Aftermath and impact
The identification and arrest of John Regan lent long-overdue vindication to the case against Donna Palomba. While the statute of limitations on the assault in 1993 had expired, Palomba's tenacity uncovered breakdowns in the system. Her case became a cause célèbre, drawing national attention to how sexual assault victims are treated by the justice system.
Palomba went on to start a nonprofit group called Jane Doe No More, which is a voice for survivors of sexual assault and aims to transform the processing of these types of cases. Her case, as told by Dateline, remains a powerful model of strength and a very long road to justice that so many survivors are forced to walk.
Dateline's Evil Paid a Visit is a detailed and evidence-based report of the case of Donna Palomba, examining the crime and ongoing aftermath. It poses serious questions regarding institutional response, the integrity of evidence, and the determination of those in pursuit of justice.