Why is Logan Paul under fire? Private jet demands $400k from influencer for damaging plane

Logan Paul is under scrutiny this week for two separate financial disputes. A private jet company claims he damaged an aircraft door, seeking $400k in repairs. The second issue involves lingering refund promises to investors in his CryptoZoo NFT project.

Both matters have drawn attention to Logan Paul’s responsibilities as a public figure and raised questions about how he handles setbacks. Below, each aspect is detailed with direct quotes from Paul and those affected.

Also Read: Luigi Mangione indicted on federal charges; face death penalty for the murder of healthcare CEO

---

What the private jet company alleges in its $400,000 claim

A private jet charter service alleges that Logan Paul opened an exit door while the cabin remained pressurized, causing significant damage and prompting a demand for $400,000 in repairs.

In his vlog, Logan Paul described a terrifying mid‑flight incident:

“The plane was pressurising and the flight attendants like literally couldn’t open the door,”

He said. “So I went and I opened it and it like exploded and the doors flew off… I thought I did a good deed. I had to write a letter to the FAA saying what happened, and today I get a letter from the f**king charter company saying it’s my fault… Thank God we film everything.”

Newsweek later reported that the charter service dropped its lawsuit over the “exploded” door incident, though discussions over potential liability reportedly continue. Paul has called the initial claim “pathetic”, stressing that safety footage should clear up any misunderstanding.

---

How Logan Paul pledged to make CryptoZoo investors whole

In January 2024, Paul announced he would use $1.8 million of his funds to buy back NFTs from CryptoZoo participants after the project failed to deliver a working game.

On X, Logan Paul wrote, “Today, I am incredibly happy to announce that I am delivering on my promise to buy back Base Egg and Base Animal CryptoZoo NFTs for their original price”.

The initiative aimed to refund 1,000 ETH, roughly $1.9 million at the time, to holders who opted in shortly after the announcement.

Also Read: Who is Chimpanzini Bananini? Exploring the viral TikTok brainrot character's origin and more

---

Why the refund program’s fine print has caused frustration

TechCrunch noted that claimants must waive any “actual or anticipated claims against Paul” to participate in the buy‑back, effectively preventing further legal action over CryptoZoo.

Some investors also found that only select NFT types qualified, leaving others ineligible for reimbursement. These conditions prompted criticism that the refunds did not fully address investor losses.

Also Read: Why is Limestone University facing possible closure? Complete reason explained

---

How investors and commentators have responded publicly

Internet investigator Coffeezilla, whose videos first exposed CryptoZoo’s shortcomings, accused Paul of stalling:

“Logan Paul has stonewalled these victims for a year. Refuses to communicate, refuses to create the game he promised for three years, refuses to refund the $10s of thousands they lost”.

On social media, many echoed concerns that while Paul moves quickly to cover personal damages, the NFT refunds lag. Others noted that, unlike the jet claim, where footage might settle the matter, CryptoZoo investors lack clear timelines or transparent updates.

---

Logan Paul faces two controversies: a $400,000 private jet damage claim and outstanding refund obligations to CryptoZoo investors. His public statements aim to clarify the jet incident, while his NFT buy‑back proposal remains mired in fine‑print questions and delayed payouts.

Both episodes underline the scrutiny influencers face when financial disputes intersect with their public personas, and how timely, transparent communication can be critical in resolving such conflicts.

Also Read: "DEIDUBBBZ": iDubbbz seemingly responds to backlash of releasing Ethan Klein Content Cop