'%20x='0'%20y='0'%20height='100%25'%20width='100%25'%20%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20xlink%3Ahref=''%3E%3C/image%3E%3C/svg%3E)
A broad discussion has unfolded in Japan over whether AI‑generated images mimicking Studio Ghibli’s style—an effect dubbed “Ghiblification”—should be treated as copyright infringement. During an April 16 House Cabinet Committee session, Hirohiko Nakahara clarified that:
“If it is only a matter of the style or ideas being similar, then it would not be considered copyright infringement”
It was reported that OpenAI’s ChatGPT saw record usage spikes after rolling out its Ghibli‑style image feature. Hayao Miyazaki once said he was “utterly disgusted” when shown an early AI render of Ghibli art. Artist Karla Ortiz called the trend “an insult” to the original creators and warned of exploitation.
A purported cease‑and‑desist letter claiming Studio Ghibli had sued an AI app went viral, but the studio later debunked it as fake. No binding law currently bans “Ghiblification,” and courts are expected to define the limits of permissible AI use under copyright law.
Lawmakers question the copyright status of “Ghiblification”
On April 16, Representative Masato Imai officially asked whether AI prompts like “Ghiblification” could breach existing legislation.
He summarised that “the use of styles and ideas is legal, but if [an AI-generated image] were recognised as being ‘Ghibli itself,’ then that would be a violation of law”.
Nakahara noted that any determination of infringement must be made by the courts. This marked one of Japan’s first formal political debates on AI‑generated art.
ALSO READ: Why is Limestone University facing possible closure? Complete reason explained
Differentiating style from specific works under Japanese law
Japanese law protects specific creative expressions but not general artistic styles. Nakahara explained that only outputs “similar to or reliant on preexisting copyrighted works” could trigger legal action.
Legal experts point out that proving an AI image copies distinct Ghibli frames, rather than merely evoking a shared aesthetic, is challenging. As noted, Studio Ghibli's look is the product of multiple designers, making a singular “Ghibli style” hard to define legally.
ALSO READ: Luigi Mangione indicted on federal charges; face death penalty for the murder of healthcare CEO
Creators and fans voice mixed reactions
Many traditional animators fear AI could devalue manual artistry by automating cherished techniques. On social media, some users praised the ease of generating Ghibli‑like scenes, while others condemned it as “blatant artistic theft.”
Karla Ortiz, a professional illustrator, urged studios to seek compensation when AI uses their work, warning that unchecked training on copyrighted art “undermines the principle” of creator rights.
Viral misinformation around legal threats
A fake cease‑and‑desist letter alleging Studio Ghibli had sued the AI app “Gib” circulated widely in late March. Studio Ghibli clarified that the letter from “Sakura & Hoshino LLP” was fraudulent, noting the law firm and contact details were invalid. This incident exposed how quickly misinformation can inflame debates over AI and copyright.
Next steps and potential court rulings
No statutory ban on Ghiblification exists at present. Lawmakers are awaiting judicial decisions to establish clear boundaries between permissible style‑evocation and unlawful copying. As AI image tools evolve, Japan’s legal system will likely play a pivotal role in shaping global norms for creative AI use.
The debate over AI‑generated Studio Ghibli‑style art highlights a broader clash between technological innovation and copyright protection. While style emulation remains legal under current law, close imitation of exclusive Studio Ghibli works may face scrutiny in court. Creators, fans, and lawmakers are all watching as judicial rulings emerge to define the permissible scope of AI in creative fields.
ALSO READ: Jake Paul to follow up Mike Tyson bout with fight against WBC champion Julio César Chávez Jr
Reply
