'%20x='0'%20y='0'%20height='100%25'%20width='100%25'%20%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20xlink%3Ahref=''%3E%3C/image%3E%3C/svg%3E)
Mark Rober, a popular YouTuber and former NASA engineer, is facing backlash after posting a video titled "Can You Fool A Self Driving Car?" on March 15, 2025. The video compared Tesla's Autopilot system to Luminar's LiDAR technology. Critics claim the video misled viewers by testing Tesla's Autopilot instead of its Full Self-Driving (FSD) feature.
The controversy started because viewers believed Rober's video suggested Tesla's FSD was being tested. Instead, the video featured Tesla's Autopilot, a system mainly designed for cruise control. Many viewers argued that this misled potential buyers about Tesla's capabilities. The video's title further added to the confusion.
Rober conducted various tests, including one where a Tesla Model Y crashed into a painted wall designed to blend with the road. He later clarified that the vehicle was not using FSD at the time of the crash.
Despite this explanation, some critics claimed Rober intentionally framed the video to promote Luminar's technology while portraying Tesla's system in a negative light. Many netizens took to social media to accuse him of behavior.
"I feel sorry for you Mark Rober, good luck in coming back from this one" said a netizen on X
"Man imagine not knowing the difference between autopilot and FSD and calling yourself an engineer" said another netizen
"I don’t understand why you’re using auto pilot. Do you wanna borrow 100 bucks for FSD sub to run it back? I’ll lend you" said a netizen
"Bro this is embarrassing. Used to respect you." remarked a netizen
"Dawg Tesla can detect if my eye pupils aren’t looking in the right direction… there are some extreme inconsistencies here." said a netizen
"A lifetime to build credibility, one fake video to lose it." exclaimed a netizen
Did Mark Rober intentionally promote Luminar's technology?
Some critics claimed that Rober's video was unfairly biased in favor of Luminar's LiDAR system. They argued that Rober highlighted Tesla's failure while promoting Luminar's performance. Luminar's system uses laser technology to detect obstacles more precisely, which some believe gave it an advantage in Rober's controlled tests.
Supporters of Rober defended his video, stating that the tests demonstrated a valid safety concern. They argued that regardless of the system used, Tesla's vehicle should have detected the painted wall and stopped safely. These viewers claimed that Rober's focus was on potential risks and improving self-driving technology.
While Rober has not directly addressed claims of bias, critics continue to point out that Luminar benefited from the video. Some believe this connection suggests Rober's video unfairly promoted one system over the other.
Why are viewers upset about the video?
Critics believe Rober's video title implied that Tesla's Full Self-Driving feature was tested. Instead, the video focused on Autopilot, which lacks the advanced capabilities of FSD. Autopilot is designed mainly for highway driving and requires driver supervision at all times. This difference was not clearly stated in the video.
Viewers also questioned the accuracy of Rober's demonstration. In one test, the Tesla Model Y failed to detect a painted wall disguised as a road extension. Some claimed that such a scenario does not accurately reflect real-world driving conditions. They argued that focusing on this unusual test painted Tesla's system as less capable than it truly is.
Rober later released additional footage to clarify that the vehicle was not using FSD. However, some viewers maintained that this clarification was insufficient, as the initial video still appeared to misrepresent Tesla's capabilities.
Did Mark Rober intentionally promote Luminar's technology?
A few analysts accused Rober of being unjustly biased against Luminar's LiDAR system. They said that Rober emphasized Tesla's shortcomings while hyping up Luminar's performance. Luminar's system has been utilizing laser technology to identify obstacles with greater precision, something that some think provided it with a benefit in Rober's controlled experiments.
Defenders of Rober stood up for his video, citing that the tests showed a genuine safety issue. They contended that no matter what system they employed, Tesla's car should have seen the painted wall and come to a safe stop. These viewers said that Rober's intention was to highlight possible dangers and make self-driving technology better.
Although Rober has not explicitly responded to accusations of bias, critics still argue that Luminar gained from the video. Some feel that this association implies Rober's video biasedly advocated for one system over the other.
How has social media reacted?
Social media platforms have recorded mixed reactions to the scandal. Some of his fans were let down by Rober, accusing him of misleading viewers and tarnishing his image. These critics maintained that his background as an engineer gave his video's claims authenticity, so the confusion was worse. Others defended Rober, saying that his video raised valid safety concerns.
They pointed out that Tesla's implementation of cameras instead of LiDAR could pose a risk in certain scenarios. Defenders argued that Rober's video should induce Tesla to improve safety options. Rober has not yet issued a detailed response to the scandal. On the internet, however, many still debate whether or not the video was a staged misdirection or an honest mistake.
Mark Rober's Tesla video has provoked robust responses among viewers, as many have accused him of misleading. Others argue that the title of the video misleadingly described Tesla's capabilities by highlighting Autopilot rather than Full Self-Driving. There are also those who feel Rober promoted Luminar's technology unjustly.
Whereas fans justify Rober's attention to safety matters, the debacle has sparked concern regarding how technical information should be presented to the public by creators. As discussions go on, fans wait for a clear reaction from Rober.
Your perspective matters!
Start the conversation
